Project 1: Analysis of Thien’s writing and Lesson Plan
Analysis
T (pronounced “T”) is a 6th grader at Juanita Elementary. My analysis of his writing is based on only one sample, a “Where I’m from….” poem that he wrote in response to a prompt he was given by his teacher. This prompt gave very specific instructions as to what he should include in this poem. I additionally had Thien complete a spelling inventory test to determine the spelling stage that summarizes his development in this area.
Ownership and Meaning of the Piece
I learned a lot about T form reading his poem. I knew he loved computers and enjoyed playing video games (I am from a laptop screen and a TV screen that plays video games.) I also knew he loved to spend time in his backyard and enjoyed living in his neighborhood (His poem referred to his neighborhood four times and he mentioned several items in his backyard; the grass, a storage shed, gardening tools, a broken rake, etc.) When I asked him about writing he told me that he didn’t mind doing this assignment but it wasn’t his favorite subject. (He told me his favorite academic subject is math.)
Six Traits Assessment
IDEAS
T has good ideas and knows a lot about his topic because he chose to write a poem about himself (and, of course, no one is better qualified to do this, then T). His “Where I’m from” poem is an attempt to create a piece of writing that is representative of specific moments in his life that has contributed to who he is today. The writing prompt he was given helped him do this. It prompted him to think about; items found in and around his home, yard and neighborhood, individuals in his life that may have influenced him, family sayings, food served at family gatherings and special places around his home or room where he may keep special items. He has done an excellent job of reflecting on these things and mentioning them in his poem. He talks about laptop and computer screens, his backyard and neighborhood, his grandpa and uncle, frequent sayings he hears in his home, foods he likes and some of the toys/things enjoyed when he was much younger. All these ideas helped me get to know T as a person. (Incidentally, Thien mentioned many of these same ideas during our first meeting.)
The details he includes about the subjects he writes about, however, are very general. It would help the reader if he included more information in these details. He writes, for example, about a couch his family sits on. What do the family members do while sitting on this couch? Do they watch TV? Do they play games, visit? T leaves these important details out of his poem and keeps the reader wondering.
ORGANIZATION
T’s poem is very well organized. He exactly follows the writing format he is given. His poem has eight stanzas and each one includes the specific details he was prompted to write about, according to the assignment instructions. The first prompt, for example, tells him to list items found around his home. Thien lists a laptop screen, a TV, a couch and a desk. The second instruction tells him to list items found in his yard. He lists grass, bugs, thorns, leaves and a broken rake. He carefully read each line of instruction to be included and then wrote about something in his life that related to it. The very last instruction was to end his poem with a line or two that connected his present to his past. Thien does this quite nicely when he makes the observation that his life now really isn’t that much different from his life as a child. (He just has different clothes and different toys.) He makes the statement that he’s just, “growing up” – a natural progression in his life.
VOICE
Thien’s writing seems sincere, but it doesn’t seem fully engaged or involved. His writing has a discernable purpose (writing about himself), but it’s not compelling. He seems to keep his readers at a comfortable distance. There is one section of his poem, however, where he does take a risk, by including more personal details about his home life. When he’s asked to include family sayings he writes, “I told you so,” “Stop bugging your brother” and “TV smaller”. These “sayings” are quite telling about his family and of a more personal nature. They provided a window into T’s relationship with his family members, although it is not clear which family members he is referring.
WORD CHOICE
The words T uses are adequate and correct in a general sense but they don’t paint a vivid picture in the reader’s mind. He includes very few adjectives in his poem and the ones he does use are somewhat ordinary. For example, he writes about the big couch his family sits on. This term is somewhat relative. Does T say the couch is big because all members of his family can sit on it comfortably together? Or is it big because it takes up so much space in the room it occupies? This description of the couch in his home fails to give a clear picture of this piece of furniture or the meaning it has for him. (Is the couch a focal point in his family? Does his family spend a lot of time together on it?) T could give additional details such as its color, its style or whether it’s covered in fabric or leather to help his readers picture it in their minds. Thien writes about many different items in his poem, such as a desk, rocks and grass, but fails to go into any detail about them.
SENTENCE FLUENCY
T’s poem is easy to read but, at times, doesn’t flow smoothly when read aloud. For example, he writes, “I am from leaves and broken rake.” This line seems to read much smoother when merely adding an “a” before the word broken. He also uses the line, “I am from” in twenty-four out of the twenty-eight lines in his poem. Although this is clearly a style used in this type of poem Thien may have provided more “interest” if he hadn’t repeated these three words quite as often as he does. In fact, of the few times he didn’t write “I am from” it almost appears to be a mistake because it varies from his format. For example, in the fourth stanza of T’s poem, he writes, “I have an uncle who is in medical school and might go to Afghanistan” doesn’t seem to “flow” because he writes, “I am from an uncle…..in his first line, “I am from a grandpa…..” in his second line and “I am from a grandpa…..” in his third line. Instead of adding interest, it makes me wonder if he did this deliberately or if it’s an oversight on his part. Thien may also want to try varying the length of his sentences to add interest because most of them are fairly short
CONVENTIONS
Thien demonstrates a good grasp of writing conventions. He has very few errors in his final draft so his poem is readable and easy to understand. I believe the few errors that do appear in his paper, however, could have been caught if he had consulted a list of previously set up editing expectations, such as the ones listed in Routman’s book, Writing Essentials, as he read his paper one final time. (It was evident that he had proofread his paper earlier because quite a few corrections/changes had already been made.) For example, if T had referred to a pre-established list instructing him to look for repeated words, I am sure he would have caught the repetition in his first line of verse. The first line of T’s poem reads, “I am from am from a laptop screen…..” I believe he inadvertently repeated the fourth and fifth words, “am” and “from” because they are listed twice. T also omitted the article “a” before the adjective “broken” in the fourth line of his second stanza. His poem seems to read much better when the “a” precedes the adjective describing the noun he uses, rake. T, for the most part, has used capitals correctly. He correctly capitalized the first line of every line of his poem as well as all the proper nouns listed, for example, “Afghanistan”. In one line, however, he fails to capitalize the first letter of the first word in a line of dialogue. It’s hard to know if he’s aware of this rule because in the other two lines of dialogue the first words are “I” and “TV”( both of which are capitalized, regardless of where they appear in a piece of writing). A final error I noticed was T's representation of the letter six, which should be spelled out rather than being written as a number.
Spelling
T is an excellent speller. There was only one misspelled word in his original draft and that was corrected after he proofread and typed his final paper. (He had spelled neighborhood as “neighboorbood” in his original draft.) The only word Thien misspelled, when I gave him the spelling inventory test, was cellar. According to this inventory, his spelling level would likely be assessed to be in the middle syllables & affixes stage (Bear et al, 2004) where he needs to focus on syllable junctures, consonant doubling, inflected endings, and prefixes and suffixes.
PRESENTATION
T typed the final version of his poem so his presentation is excellent. He used an easy to read font and alternately indented the stanzas of his poem. He also used two different colors for the words and then another color for his title, in a much larger font, for added interest. The font, size, and spacing are very eye-catching.
Lesson Plan
Using Word Webs to Teach Synonyms for Commonly Used Words
Objectives:
The students will increase their knowledge of synonyms for common words such as good and nice.
The students will expand their written and oral vocabularies.
The students will increase their use of vivid description words.
Standards:
EALR 3: The student writes clearly and effectively.
Component 3.2: Uses appropriate style.
GLE: 3.2.2: Analyzes and selects language appropriate for specific audiences and purposes
-Searches for alternatives to commonly used words, particularly in persuasive writing and poetry.
Materials:
-Print-outs of partially completed word webs
-Pencil and lined paper
-A dictionary, thesaurus and/or online resources to find synonyms
Instructional strategies:
This lesson would start with the whole class. Later, it would be divided up into groups of three to four students.
The lesson would begin by reading a description of something prepared in advance, containing the words good, and nice several times. A second description would then be read, about the same thing, but this time many descriptive synonyms would be used in place of these two overused words. The students would be asked to choose which description was more interesting and why. The students would be informed that effective writers use specific, descriptive language to appeal to their readers because they want them to be able to “visualize” the person, place or thing they’re describing. A classroom discussion about the importance of using specific adjectives in certain situations, such as in the case of a travel brochure or a car advertisement, would then follow.
Partially completed word webs would then be distributed with the frequently used words, good and nice in the center of the web. It would be explained that these adjectives are very commonly used in student writing and speaking, noting that more specific, descriptive words could often be used more appropriately instead.
These word webs would then be reviewed with the class. The students would brainstorm other synonyms that they already knew and then discuss the various categories to which they would belong. The students would then be asked to use these synonyms in sentences.
At this point the class would be divided into groups of three or four students. Each group would be assigned two categories from the word web. For example, one group would be asked to find good and nice words that describe the weather (such as pleasant and sunny) and food (delicious, healthy, and tasty). Each group would be give a thesaurus, a dictionary, and/or access to the internet to search for words on Dictionary.com and Thesaurus.com.
After the students finished their group work they would be asked to present the words they found in their search to the entire class. As students discussed the words they found during their research, they will be asked to add the ones they don’t already have to their individual webs. This addition of items will be modeled for the students under the document camera.
The students will then be asked to individually write a short description of something (a movie, a book, an article of clothing, etc.) using at least five adjectives other than good and/or nice that they found during their research.
-This lesson was adapted from the ReadWriteThink website
Assessment
The teacher will assess whether the students have increased their knowledge of synonyms for common words, such as good and nice, by reviewing the descriptions the students were asked to write during this assignment, as well as in future written work.
The teacher will also assess whether students have expanded their written and oral vocabularies by observing students’ use of synonyms during classroom conversations and discussions and through future written assignments.
.